Amos Irwin (Fletcher School) and Kevin Gallagher (Boston University) have a new working paper exploring Chinese mining investment in Peru
. These researchers are painstaking and methodical, and build up their findings with extensive fieldwork, interviews, and careful gleaning of news reports. Their earlier research on Chinese finance in Latin America
(published at the Inter-American Dialogue, where Sinologist/Latin Americanist Margaret Myers is leading the China and Latin America program) is a model of careful scholarship, so it's a pleasure to see them venturing into a new area. Here's the abstract of the new study:
Chinese investment in Latin America has exploded in recent
years, leading observers to worry that Chinese companies may transplant poor
labor and environmental practices to the region. In this Discussion Paper,
GDAE’s Amos Irwin and Kevin P. Gallagher evaluate the economic, environmental
and social impacts of Chinese mining in Latin America and compare that performance
to other major foreign and domestic firms in the same sector. Based on new
quantitative inspection data from Peru, the researchers find that the Chinese
company Shougang Hierro Peru has not performed significantly worse
than its foreign or domestic counterparts. In fact, a US-based firm has been
among the most egregious violators of Peruvian and global standards as of late.
Chinese investment in the region is so recent that only one mining company has
been operating long enough to assess its impact. Shougang Hierro Peru has been
widely denounced for its environmental and social record, which has been
decried in the literature as far worse than that of comparable foreign-owned
companies. Much of this literature blames a “culture clash,” concluding that
Chinese companies operate irresponsibly in Latin America because they are
predisposed to poor labor and environmental standards.
Using new government data and historical archives, Irwin and Gallagher find
that while Shougang performed poorly on many indicators, when compared to other
foreign and domestic mining companies its poor performance has not stood out in
recent years. Rather, the Peruvian government has continually failed to force
mining companies to comply with their investment commitments, respect
government and global standards, or negotiate with their unions.
They conclude that the Shougang case study does not necessarily determine that
future Chinese mining companies will be more likely to bring poor environmental
or labor practices to Latin America than other foreign and domestic
competitors. High social and environmental costs are endemic to mining in Latin
America. Consistent with the broader literature on the subject, this study
shows that nation-states like Peru cannot count on foreign or domestic firms to
self-regulate. To truly maximize the benefits from
natural resource extraction, and to mitigate the risks, nations need to stiffly
regulate, monitor and discipline firms operating in the sector—regardless of
the firm's origin.
I'm not sure that we have a comparable (published) comparative study of mining investment in Africa, although the Human Rights Watch study in Zambia
that I've blogged on came close. I hope this study will help stimulate researchers working on similar China-Africa issues.