At the fifth ministerial meeting of the Forum on China Africa Cooperation held in Beijing last summer, the Chinese announced a new pledge of a $20 billion line of credit "for Africa". Almost immediately, reporters began to call this pledge of credit "Chinese aid" to Africa. Jane Perlez at the New York Times probably influenced many when she called it "Chinese aid". Others confidently labeled the $20 billion in finance "concessional".
But was this aid? Was it concessional? I doubted it. But I was on vacation in the Olympic Penninsula National Park at the time, and kayaking in the San Juan Islands. I couldn't check it out, and then it receded as a hot issue.
Former President Hu Jintao made the pledge in his July 19, 2012 address to the Beijing meeting. The first of five priority areas was to "expand cooperation in investment and financing". Hu said "China will provide $20 billion dollars of credit" to African countries. This was followed by the second priority area, "to increase assistance to Africa." The new loans are clearly not being positioned as assistance. There is also no mention of their being concessional or preferential.
The two sides were delighted to see the steady progress in China-Africa
financial and banking cooperation in recent years, which has played a
positive role in supporting the growth of businesses from both sides and
boosting China-Africa business cooperation.
China will expand its cooperation with Africa in investment and
financing to help boost Africa's sustainable development. China will
provide a credit line of US$20 billion to African countries to mainly
support the development of infrastructure, agriculture, manufacturing,
and development of small and medium-sized enterprises in Africa.
Later, under Section 5.1, the Action Plan focuses on "Development Assistance". The Chinese pledge here is not specific and talks only of "scaling up" assistance and making "active use" of foreign aid instruments: grants, zero-interest loans, and concessional loans:
China pledged to scale up its assistance to Africa and to create new
ways of assistance and make the assistance more effective.
China will make active use of the grants, interest-free loans and
concessional loans to help the development of African countries.
So why did the pledge of $20 billion in investment and bank finance get interpreted as "concessional aid"? In the West, we are so used to seeing Africa as a place that needs our aid, rather than a place where our banks can do a rousing business. Africans are also used to big countries pledging big aid -- as urged by Bono and Jeffrey Sachs. The Chinese clearly see it differently. There are risks here -- a downturn in China, lower demand for African commodities, difficulties with repayment, a new debt crisis? So far, these remain hypothetical. Reporters and observers need to reboot their view of Chinese engagement in Africa. This is not about altruism. It's "mutual benefit" in intention: Chinese loans, Chinese companies doing the work, African infrastructure being built, and (probably) repaid by African exports.